Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Syd Malaxos's avatar

I teach chemistry and physics. I watch students use tools like these every day.

Here's what nobody measures: the moment between the question and the answer is where learning happens. Every tool on this list compresses that moment. Gemini "explores ideas" for you. NotebookLM "understands" your material for you. Goblin Tools breaks tasks into steps for you.

What's left for the human?

A 2026 study (Shaw & Nave) found students had 14x lower odds of answering correctly when AI answered first — and their confidence went UP. The tools didn't make them smarter. The tools made them certain they were smart while removing the process that actually builds understanding.

I'm not anti-tool. I built a program that teaches students how to use AI deliberately. But the sequence matters: ownership before extension. Build the thinking first. Then the tools become powerful instead of replacing.

The struggle isn't the part you skip. The struggle IS the learning.

David Knickerbocker's avatar

Aim for outcomes not adding more tools you don’t need.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?